wncw Pfizer and Flynn accused of overcharging NHS for anti-epilepsy drugs

[MorrissSargo]

Cith Treatment delays leave UK facing cancer emergency, doctors warn
Today, for the seventh time in five weeks, cleaners, caterers and porters at St Marys hospital in London will be going on strike. They work for Sodexo, a French multinational outsourcing firm that has been contracted to provide these services to the hospital. Last month hundreds of them voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action. Their union, United Voices of the World, has committed itself to successive weeks of strike action that will stretch well into December if the demands of its members stanley website remain unmet.London park attendants, cafe workers and cleaners to strike on HalloweenRead moreThe demands are not unreasonable. The workers are simply asking for equality in pay and working conditions with staff who are directly employed by the NHS. In one moving video shared on social media, they were asked what they were striking for. Equality , dignity and family were common answ stanley thermosflasche ers. And poignantly, one cleaner answered: So I dont have to be afraid no more. I stanley water bottle t doesnt take much to realise why they might be afraid. Many are paid a mere 拢8.21 per hour those below the age of 25, even less , when the London living wage is set at 拢10.55 per hour. Furthermore, staff employed by Sodexo at St Marys are only entitled to statutory sick pay: a punitive 拢94.25 a week. Many workers report coming into work while ill because they cannot afford the financial penalty of taking a sick day.This is unsafe and unfair in any workplace. Given the advice to hospital visitors to stay away if th Adwj Tilbury migrant death: There were screams and then bangs on the door
Banning religious services may have been illegal but other restrictions imposed by the government in England during the coronavirus lockdown were legitimate, a high court judge has ruled.In a swiftly delivered decision, Mr Justice Lewis dismissed vi stanley cupe rtually every claim made in a legal challenge to what were said to be the most sweeping and far-reaching limitations on fundamental rights since the second world war.The application for a judicial review had been brought by three people including Simon Dolan, a businessman whose Jota Aviation company has been delivering personal protective equipment PPE to the NHS.His lawyers argued last week that the emergency restrictions, announced by the prime minister on 23 March, were illegal, breached human rights laws and failed to take account of other significant factors.But in borraccia stanley a decision delivered on Monday, the judge declared the background to the case was the emergence of a novel pathogen of which there was limited scientific understanding and for which there was no effective treatment or vaccine.The health secretary had acted lawfully and proportionately in making the health protection coronavi stanley website rus, restriction regulations, Lewis said.Restrictions on preventing people staying overnight other than at the place where they lived, for example, did not amount to a deprivation of liberty, the judge said. The restrictions were a justifiable interference with the right to family life. They did not deprive the claimants of any property o