ekjs Decision on extradition treaties is overdue

[MorrissSargo]

Bujb For some it s feed your kids or your dog : Britons turn to pet food banks
The introduction of majority verdicts in criminal trials in England and Wales was partly motivated by a desire stanley vaso to dilute the influence of minority ethnic people and the labouring classes serving on juries, according to research.The study, by the miscarriage of justice charity Appeal, said that while the widely accepted narrative for allowing majority verdicts 鈥?introduced by parliament in 1967 鈥?as opposed to unanimous verdicts, was that it would prevent jury nobbling corruption , there was another reason that was more disreputable.Delving into government files and other archival materials, the authors stanley en mexico of the report, published in the journal Race Class, found little evidence that nobbling was widespread, but that an increase in eligible jurors from different racial and class backgrounds led to a perceived decline in the calibre of jurors 鈥?reflective of wider public anxieties about Commonwealth immigration, Black Power stanley becher and white disenfranchisement .The report, Majority Jury Verdicts in England and Wales: A Vestige of White Supremacy , draws parallels with the 2020 landmark case in the US, Ramos v Louisiana, that outlawed majority verdicts for serious crimes amid recognition of their racist origins, including evidence that they were introduced in Louisiana in 1898 to suppress the votes of black jurors following the abolition of slavery.In the US, where Oregon was the only other state that allowed majority verdicts at the time of the supreme court ruling, it is argu Uecy The restorative magic of Benny and Hot
BELFAST: There were a coupl stanley ca e of surreal moments during today s court case in which the journalist Suzanne Breen w stanley cup as fighting off a demand by the Police Service of Northern Ireland PSNI that she reveal her confidential sources.The Sunday Tribune s northern editor had spent a considerable part of her 45 minutes on the witness stand here in Belfast explaining the real and immediate threat to her life should she disclose the identity of a Real IRA member she interviewed.She had pointed out that the Real IRA, a military terrorist group without a political wing the bullet without the ballot , had illustrated its ruthlessness several times over.It was responsible for the 199 stanley cup 8 Omagh bombing in which 29 people were killed. While murdering two soldiers in Antrim in March this year two pizza delivery men were injured yet it admitted that they were, in its view, legitimate targets because they were collaborators. As BBC Panorama reporter John Ware explained to the court, within months of his programme about the Omagh bombing being screened BBC TV Centre was bombed by the Real IRA in 2001.So there was form. It was obvious that the threat to Breen s life - passed on to her through an anonymous source with the chilling phrase, You know what co-operating with the PSNI means - should clearly not be taken with a pinch of salt.She explained over and over that she would be in grave danger should she breach the journalists code by revealing her sources.The v